Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0281162, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2224480

ABSTRACT

Far-ultraviolet radiation C light (far-UVC; 222 nm wavelength) has received attention as a safer light for killing pathogenic bacteria and viruses, as no or little DNA damage is observed after irradiation in mammalian skin models. Far-UVC does not penetrate deeply into tissues; therefore, it cannot reach the underlying critical basal cells. However, it was unclear whether far-UVC (222-UVC) irradiation could cause more biological damage at shallower depths than the 254 nm UVC irradiation (254-UVC), which penetrates more deeply. This study investigated the biological effects of 222- and 254-UVC on the small and transparent model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. At the same energy level of irradiation, 222-UVC introduced slightly less cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer damage to naked DNA in solution than 254-UVC. The survival of eggs laid during 0-4 h after irradiation showed a marked decrease with 254-UVC but not 222-UVC. In addition, defect of chromosomal condensation was observed in a full-grown oocyte by 254-UVC irradiation. In contrast, 222-UVC had a significant effect on the loss of motility of C. elegans. The sensory nervous system, which includes dopamine CEP and PVD neurons on the body surface, was severely damaged by 222-UVC, but not by the same dose of 254-UVC. Interestingly, increasing 254-UVC irradiation by about 10-fold causes similar damage to CEP neurons. These results suggest that 222-UVC is less penetrating, so energy transfer occurs more effectively in tissues near the surface, causing more severe damage than 254-UVC.


Subject(s)
Caenorhabditis elegans , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/genetics , Ultraviolet Rays , DNA Damage , Pyrimidine Dimers/radiation effects , Skin/microbiology , Mammals
2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(18)2021 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1934105

ABSTRACT

Zinc pyrithione (ZnPT) is an anti-fungal drug delivered as a microparticle to skin epithelia. It is one of the most widely used ingredients worldwide in medicated shampoo for treating dandruff and seborrheic dermatitis (SD), a disorder with symptoms that include skin flaking, erythema and pruritus. SD is a multi-factorial disease driven by microbiol dysbiosis, primarily involving Malassezia yeast. Anti-fungal activity of ZnPT depends on the cutaneous availability of bioactive monomeric molecular species, occurring upon particle dissolution. The success of ZnPT as a topical therapeutic is underscored by the way it balances treatment efficacy with formulation safety. This review demonstrates how ZnPT achieves this balance, by integrating the current understanding of SD pathogenesis with an up-to-date analysis of ZnPT pharmacology, therapeutics and toxicology. ZnPT has anti-fungal activity with an average in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration of 10-15 ppm against the most abundant scalp skin Malassezia species (Malassezia globosa and Malassezia restrica). Efficacy is dependent on the targeted delivery of ZnPT to the skin sites where these yeasts reside, including the scalp surface and hair follicle infundibulum. Imaging and quantitative analysis tools have been fundamental for critically evaluating the therapeutic performance and safety of topical ZnPT formulations. Toxicologic investigations have focused on understanding the risk of local and systemic adverse effects following exposure from percutaneous penetration. Future research is expected to yield further advances in ZnPT formulations for SD and also include re-purposing towards a range of other dermatologic applications, which is likely to have significant clinical impact.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Epithelium/drug effects , Organometallic Compounds/administration & dosage , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Skin/drug effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Animals , Antifungal Agents/chemistry , Dermatitis, Seborrheic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Seborrheic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Seborrheic/etiology , Dysbiosis , Epidermis/drug effects , Epithelium/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Optical Imaging/methods , Organometallic Compounds/chemistry , Pyridines/chemistry , Skin/microbiology , Skin Absorption , Spectrum Analysis
3.
Nutrients ; 13(9)2021 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1448913

ABSTRACT

The human body is host to a large number of microorganisms which conform the human microbiota, that is known to play an important role in health and disease. Although most of the microorganisms that coexist with us are located in the gut, microbial cells present in other locations (like skin, respiratory tract, genitourinary tract, and the vaginal zone in women) also play a significant role regulating host health. The fact that there are different kinds of microbiota in different body areas does not mean they are independent. It is plausible that connection exist, and different studies have shown that the microbiota present in different zones of the human body has the capability of communicating through secondary metabolites. In this sense, dysbiosis in one body compartment may negatively affect distal areas and contribute to the development of diseases. Accordingly, it could be hypothesized that the whole set of microbial cells that inhabit the human body form a system, and the dialogue between the different host microbiotas may be a contributing factor for the susceptibility to developing diseased states. For this reason, the present review aims to integrate the available literature on the relationship between the different human microbiotas and understand how changes in the microbiota in one body region can influence other microbiota communities in a bidirectional process. The findings suggest that the different microbiotas may act in a coordinated way to decisively influence human well-being. This new integrative paradigm opens new insights in the microbiota field of research and its relationship with human health that should be taken into account in future studies.


Subject(s)
Dysbiosis/metabolism , Microbiota , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Health Status , Humans , Male , Mouth/microbiology , Respiratory System/microbiology , Skin/microbiology , Urogenital System/microbiology , Vagina/microbiology
5.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 16069, 2021 08 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356580

ABSTRACT

Point-of-care testing is cost-effective, rapid, and could assist in avoiding hospital visits during a pandemic. However, they present some significant risks that current technologies cannot fully address. Skin flora contamination and insufficient specimen volume are two major limitations preventing self-collection microbiological testing outside of hospital settings. We are developing a hybrid testing procedure to bridge the laboratory test with patient-side specimen collection and transportation for molecular microbial classification of causative bacterial infection and early identification of microbial susceptibility profiles directly from whole blood or urine specimens collected patient-side by health care workers such as phlebotomists in nursing homes or family clinics. This feasibility study presents our initial development efforts, in which we tested various transportation conditions (tubes, temperature, duration) for direct-from-specimen viable pathogen detection to determine the ideal conditions that allowed for differentiation between contaminant and causative bacteria in urine specimens and optimal growth for low-concentration blood specimens after transportation. For direct-from-urine assays, the viable pathogen at the clinical cutoff of 105 CFU/mL was detected after transportation with molecular assays while contaminants (≤ 104 CFU/mL) were not. For direct-from-blood assays, contrived blood samples as low as 0.8 CFU/mL were reported positive after transportation without the need for blood culture.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/growth & development , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Specimen Handling/methods , Transportation/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Nursing Homes , Point-of-Care Testing , Skin/microbiology
6.
Biotechniques ; 70(3): 149-159, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1054921

ABSTRACT

One goal of microbial ecology researchers is to capture the maximum amount of information from all organisms in a sample. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted a gap in traditional DNA-based protocols, including the high-throughput methods the authors previously established as field standards. To enable simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 and microbial community profiling, the authors compared the relative performance of two total nucleic acid extraction protocols with the authors' previously benchmarked protocol. The authors included a diverse panel of environmental and host-associated sample types, including body sites commonly swabbed for COVID-19 testing. Here the authors present results comparing the cost, processing time, DNA and RNA yield, microbial community composition, limit of detection and well-to-well contamination between these protocols.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Microbiota/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Animals , Biodiversity , Cats , Chemical Fractionation/methods , Feces/microbiology , Feces/virology , Female , Fermented Foods/microbiology , Humans , Limit of Detection , Male , Metagenomics/methods , Mice , Saliva/microbiology , Saliva/virology , Skin/microbiology , Skin/virology
7.
Mol Ecol ; 29(17): 3167-3169, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-707100

ABSTRACT

What happens when two emergent diseases infect the same host? In a From the Cover article in this issue of Molecular Ecology, McDonald et al. (2020) compare transcriptomic responses to co-infection by the two chytrid fungi in the skin, liver and spleen of Eastern newts (Notophthalmus viridescens). Novel molecular tools, such as high-throughput DNA sequencing for genome discovery and transcriptomics, have revolutionized our understanding of host-pathogen interactions and disease ecology (Güimil et al. 2005; Rosenblum et al. 2012). For example, epidemiologists are using genomic data to track the spread of the emergent SARS-CoV-2 in real time, both locally and globally. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is routinely employed to study response to disease in humans, improving disease diagnostics, profiling and development of intervention strategies. Transcriptomic profiles may be particularly informative for emergent diseases, whose pathologies and effect on host phenotype are poorly known. Fungal pathogens increasingly threaten a variety of wild and domesticated organisms (Fisher et al. 2012), and two chytrid fungi attacking amphibians are causing one of the worst losses of vertebrate biodiversity ever recorded (Scheele et al. 2019).


Subject(s)
Chytridiomycota/immunology , Mycoses/veterinary , Salamandridae/immunology , Animals , Coinfection/immunology , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Liver/microbiology , Mycoses/immunology , Mycoses/microbiology , Salamandridae/genetics , Salamandridae/microbiology , Skin/microbiology , Spleen/microbiology , Transcriptome/genetics
9.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(4): e13481, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-601545

ABSTRACT

In view of the new viral COVID-19 pandemic, the fungal Candida auris epidemic still in progress worldwide highlights non-Candida albicans candidal infections. We describe an immunocompetent woman with a cutaneous manifestation of Candida parasilopsis fungemia, a prominent eschar, which proved to be the nidus for the candidemia. We stress the value of selectively removing eschars. C. parasilopsis and C. auris are increasingly important causes of sepsis and wound infections. We emphasize that commercially available biochemical-based tests may misidentify C. auris as C. parapsilosis, and stress the added danger of C. auris to critically ill-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Any health care facility with evidence of infection or colonization with C. auris requires very close monitoring, since this fungus is a nosocomial threat comparable to SARS-CoV-2 in its mortality and fomite adhesiveness! Both organisms have the potential to be transmitted as nosocomial pathogens; health care workers need to follow strict CDC guidelines. During this COVID-19 pandemic, every health care facility should closely monitor for the possible deadly combination of the SARS-CoV-2 and C. auris. The identification of C. auris necessitates use of sophisticated technology not readily available to make this essential diagnosis since C. auris is multi-drug resistant and isolation precautions would become paramount.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Candida/isolation & purification , Candidemia/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Dermatomycoses/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Skin/microbiology , COVID-19 , Candidemia/microbiology , Comorbidity , Dermatomycoses/diagnosis , Dermatomycoses/microbiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin/pathology
10.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 125(5): 528-534, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-401392

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore links between biodiversity on all scales and allergic disease as a measure of immune dysregulation. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Web of Science were searched using the keywords biodiversity, nature relatedness, allergic disease, microbiome, noncommunicable diseases, coronavirus disease 2019, and associated terms. STUDY SELECTIONS: Studies were selected based on relevance to human health and biodiversity. RESULTS: Contact with natural environments enriches the human microbiome, promotes regulated immune responses, and protects against allergy and both acute and chronic inflammatory disorders. These important links to ecopsychological constructs of the extinction of experience, which indicates that loss of direct, personal contact with biodiversity (wildlife and the more visible elements of the natural world), might lead to emotional apathy and irresponsible behaviors toward the environment. CONCLUSION: The immune system is a useful early barometer of environmental effects and, by means of the microbiome, is a measure of the way in which our current experiences differ from our ancestral past. Although we would benefit from further research, efforts to increase direct, personal contact with biodiversity have clear benefits for multiple aspects of physical and mental health, the skin and gut microbiome, immune function, food choices, sleep, and physical activity and promote environmental responsibility.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Susceptibility/immunology , Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Microbiota/immunology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Allergens/administration & dosage , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Biodiversity , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Ecosystem , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Extinction, Biological , Gastrointestinal Tract/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/virology , Gene-Environment Interaction , Humans , Hypersensitivity/genetics , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/microbiology , Immune System/drug effects , Pneumonia, Viral/genetics , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin/immunology , Skin/microbiology , Skin/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL